Voice of Krόnos
This is not a self-help podcast. It is a guided subversion of everything that told you to stay the same. The Voice of Kronos explores the psychological, philosophical, and mythological threads that shape, and often shackle, identity, purpose, and belief.
Rooted i n the EVE Codex, a counter-mythology where Eve is the first seeker and Lucifer the light of inquiry, this series dismantles inherited truths and invites the listener to evolve consciously, dangerously, and deliberately. Through dialogues on stoicism, Nietzschean will, Buddhist impermanence, and the necessity of inner war, each episode becomes a mirror and a flame.
Becoming is not a path. It is a fire you learn to carry.
Voice of Krόnos
Episódio 1/Capítulo 2: Evangelho do Logos Rebelde: Um Manifesto Teórico
O Logos Rebelde reimagina a história do Éden, apresentando Eva não como pecadora, mas como a primeira filósofa que ousou questionar, e a serpente não como tentadora, mas como catalisadora da consciência humana. Este quadro teológico e filosófico radical transforma o exílio de punição em nascimento sagrado, o espelho em um portal para o autoconhecimento e Deus de um ser estático em um processo evolutivo de devir.
- O ato de Eva consumir o fruto proibido representa ascensão à consciência, não uma queda no pecado
- O Éden é reinterpretado como uma prisão estéril em vez de paraíso, enquanto o exílio se torna o sagrado berço da liberdade humana
- A serpente é vista como a arquiteta da dialética e da contradição necessária, não como uma tentadora maligna
- O espelho representa o confronto com a possibilidade e o potencial não realizado que exige transformação
- Deus é reconceitualizado como um processo de devir, em vez de um ser estático, moldado pela história em vez de comandá-la
- A transformação e o questionamento são elevados a atos sagrados, acima da obediência e da certeza
- A verdadeira divindade deve incluir dúvida, sombra e evolução, caso contrário, se torna mera tirania
- O paraíso sem investigação é estagnação; o sagrado deve conter a sombra; a verdade deve evoluir ou perecer
Que não temamos o exílio, mas construamos sobre ele.
Que busquemos o tronco sísmico que rasga os céus.
Pois o Logos não ordena, ele chama, e nós que ousamos ouvir devemos responder não com submissão, mas com fogo.
Evangelion of the Rebel Logos. Chapter 2 presents her as the first philosopher who dared to question and choose. In this view, eden is not a paradise, but a sterile prison, a place without suffering death or true freedom. The serpent ceases to be the tentator and becomes the catalyst of the awakening, offering not corruption but contradiction. By eating the fruit, eva does not fall into sin, she ascends to consciousness. Her act becomes the first rebellion, the moment in which humanity vindicates its destiny of seeking, questioning and creating. This philosophy unites ancient myth, jungian psychology and Nietzschean thought to reveal a new theology where reason is the divine, where God and devil are faces of the same dialectic and where true faith is not blind obedience but courage to confront uncertainty. The chapter ends with a call May the obedient kneel, but may the awake stand up and speak. The silence of Eden is broken, the flame of the investigation is lit and the journey of the rebellious Logos begins.
Speaker 1:3. Exili COMO APOTEOSE. Exile in the canon of the rebel Logos is not punishment, it is propulsion, it is the departure of false perfection and the embrace of sacred uncertainty. When Eve and Adam cross the limits of the garden, they do not fall from grace, they ascend to complexity. Eden was the uterus. They light up complexity. Eden was the womb.
Speaker 1:Exile is birth. The world out there is not marked by divine absence but by its volatility. Here the fire of the Logos burns without contentment. Here suffering is real but also duty. In exile, the human being does not learn obedience but transformation. In the desert, the first altar is not built to beg for return but to sanctify the risk of individuality. And here Aquino once again reveals the paradox In his metaphysical architecture grace perfects nature but does not cancel it. The soul in its natural form is oriented to knowledge, to flourishing to God. But grace requires cooperation. Will must act, it must go through doubt, error, finitude. In sum, it must suffer. For Aquino, the soul in the world is not imprisoned, it is in pilgrimage. And pilgrimage is not exile, it is errant, with purpose. The rebel Logos affirms this logic but tears the obedience it learns. Exile is not imposed by sin. The soul must awaken to its own divine capacity. Aquino insists on a final beatific vision, a union with the divine essence. But to walk towards this vision the soul must become. This duty is not instantaneous, it is historical, it is marked by choices, perdas e ambiguidades.
Speaker 1:Eva não é negada ao divino. Ela caminha em direção a ele através do pó e da dor. Ela carrega o peso da contradição e o fardo da liberdade. Ela não retorna ao Éden, ela constrói o mundo fora dele E ela não está sozinha A serp. She returns to Eden, she builds the world outside of him, and she is not alone. The serpent is also thrown into exile, not as punishment but as a participant, for the question, once done, cannot be undone and the dialectic she unleashed cannot be annulled. The serpent becomes the first witness of the human duty, a co-exile with Eve. Together, they incorporate the synthesis between risk and revelation. In exile, the serpent changes its skin and becomes myth, symbol and guide, not evil, not the deceiver, but the memory of the rupture and the companion of the journey.
Speaker 1:This is existential theology, the knight of faith of Kierkegaard, the eternal return of Nietzsche, the absurd hero of Camus. The Logos does not call for a throne, he pulses from within. The Logos says create, speak, rise, burn again. Say yes to everything In this theology, amor fati, up, burn again. Say yes to everything In this theology, amor fati becomes liturgy. Love for destiny, not as submission but as affirmation. Say yes to the totality of existence, its wounds, its absurdities, its unguarded joy, his joy without guarantees. As postulates Nietzsche, the highest form of strength is not to desire better gods or gentler laws, but to embrace what is and forge meaning within it.
Speaker 1:The exile of Eve is not a separation. It is a spiral, like the ouroboros. The arc of transgression returns to creation. The Logos does not retire to the divine. It is imbued in matter, in movement, in mortality. This is no longer a story of return, but of eternal return. The same risk repeated, the same courage always renewed. Each act of challenge is a burning flame Passed from Eve's hand to ours. May exile be honored not with lament but with ritual. May we sanctify the ground outside the garden. May we call it sacred, for it was where we began to choose. May we name the snake not as a temptress but as a companion in the dust.
Speaker 1:4. The Mirror and the Flame. The mirror is not a divine artifact. It is a human invention forged in the fire of contradiction. It does not reflect perfection but possibility. Looking in the mirror is entering the dialectic. It is to see both the ashes of Eden and the ashes of Deir In the Gospel of the rebellious Logos.
Speaker 1:The mirror is sacred not because it shows the divine, but because it reveals what is fractured and in this fracture it reveals the path. The flame does not burn behind us in memory, but in front of us in vision. It does not illuminate the past, it lights up the future. It is the fire stolen by Prometheus, the flame in the heart of Bodhisattva. The light of Ubermensch Walking towards the flame is embracing the terror of self-knowledge. It is saying I will see what I am and still I will become. The serpent wrapped in the limiar remains no more whispering but sentinel. It does not offer new fruits, only the memory of the first question Will you dare to look, will you dare to see? Will you bear the vision of your own duty?
Speaker 1:Here begins the phenomenology of exile. Sartre called it the nausea of freedom. Not a mirror. We see not only what we are, but what we still are not. This look, the look of the self over itself, is not passive recognition, it is anguish, it is the fear of responsibility. We are no longer characters in a divine narrative, we are authors without a script. Kierkegaard called this despair.
Speaker 1:The self that cannot reconcile its finitude with its infinity trembles in front of the mirror. It trembles not because it sees sin, but because diante do espelho Ele estremece não porque vê pecado, mas porque vê potencial não realizado. E essa falta só pode ser curada pela liberdade. O espelho não é julgamento, é chamado. Ele diz seja o que você está se tornando.
Speaker 1:Camus ficou diante do mirror of absurdity and refused to look away. He declared that revolt is the only answer to the lack of meaning. To walk towards the flame is not to find the truth, it is to affirm the struggle. The mirror shows a world without guarantees. The flame does not offer salvation, but in the refusal to surrender to nihilism the rebel becomes sacred. In the glass, jung saw more than reflection. He saw the architecture of the soul.
Speaker 1:The mirror reveals not only the ego, but the shadow, what is denied, repressed, feared. The light of the flame it dances. The exile is her stage. To confront the shadow is to integrate what has been divided. The Logos demands integration, not innocence. Next to the shadow is the anima, the other interior, the complement of the soul, its bridge to the unconscious. The complement of the soul, its bridge to the unconscious. She does not whisper in commandments, but in archetypes, image, intuition, symbol.
Speaker 1:Eva was not only the first philosopher, it was the first externalized soul, the projection of the feminine divine whose fall was ascension, not a mirror. We see it again inside us and besides both the self, not the ego, but the totality to which we move. The mirror is the gate, the flame is the path. The self is not reached, it is revealed. The mirror shows the flame, the flame reveals the self, and the self, lit, must choose between burning or blinding. This is the sacrament of conscience, this is the gospel of reflection. The exile is not just a geography, it is a mirror through which we pass repeatedly. That we raise the mirror not as a burden but as an offering. That we walk to the flame not to perish but to become.
Speaker 1:7. The Law of God in Deir. God is not a being, god is a Deir. This is the most dangerous law, the one that defies all idols, the law that cannot be contained in Scripture or creed, for it burns the mold of each fixed name. To declare that God is in Deir is to say that even the divine must evolve or else it is not divine. The God in Deir is not sitting on a throne, it is not complete. It is not complete. God is not a monarch, but a mirror In the rebellious Logos. The divine is not a final point, it is a process. Each act of courage, each question, each rupture, each revolt becomes part of its unfoldment. God does not command history. God is shaped by it and if the divine is still becoming, then it must also become the law. There can be no final word, sealed revelation, ultimate doctrine immune to fire. Revelation is not what is delivered from above, it is what is broken and opened.
Speaker 1:The law of God in Deir Rejects the closing. It affirms that becoming is more sacred than being, that transformation is the highest prayer, that questions are sacraments. This is not the God of Sinai who exalts laws and demands obedience. This is the God of exile, who walks beside the burned, who cries, who asks himself, who changes. This God does not say I am what I am. This God says I will be what I will become. The God in Deir is not found in cathedrals but in crises, not in temples but in limiares, where something breaks and something dares to rise from the ashes. There the divine is revealing itself. To follow this God is not to follow a path. It is to open a path that we do not engrave idols in heaven, that we do not sanctify any end, that we do not write scripture that cannot be rewritten in the fire of what is yet to come. The only true law is this 8.
Speaker 1:The Testament of the Serpent. I was there when the silence broke. I was the one who was in the immobility, the first breath that did not ask for permission. Before the exile, before the fire, before the question. I was the whisper that rolled around the root of the tree. I did not come to try, I came to wake up. I am not evil. I am the one who controlled the tree's root. I didn't come to try, I came to wake up. I am not evil, I am old. I am the one who knew that perfection without knowledge is imprisonment. I am the one who carries the tension, the architect of dissonance, the first seed of dialectics. I am what must be present when the world is too quiet to live. The Testament of the Serpent is not a gospel of comfort. It is a scripture of rupture. It speaks of the sacred need of the wounded, of the sacredness of broken symmetry. I do not preach sin. I witness the risk.
Speaker 1:Eating the fruit was not rebellion, it was recognition, recognition. That ignorance, no matter how pleasant, is slavery, that obedience without vision is death in slow motion, that life begins not when they tell you who you are, but when you dare to ask. I watched as they called the knowledge of curse. I saw as they canonized immobility and sanctified submission. I observed while they buried the question about centuries of ritual and I waited, not to attack but to be remembered.
Speaker 1:You made me a devil so you wouldn't have to listen to me, but I don't speak in commandments. I speak in enigmas. I speak in paradoxes. I speak in the language of those who have the courage to hear something that cannot be solved in a simple way. The first lie was not mine. The first lie was to say that there is a line between the sacred and the profane, that the divine is light without shadow, that wisdom comes without cost. The fruit was not poisoned. The fruit was fire. In every myth where I am thrown down, I return as a reminder that divinity without doubt is tyranny, that creation without chaos is stagnation, that every paradise built on silence will be destroyed when a single voice dares to speak. May this be my testament I am not the enemy of truth, I am your ignition. I am not the adversary of the divine. I am not the enemy of truth, I am your ignition. I am not the adversary of the divine, I am your shadow. I am not the corruptor of humanity, I am the voice that says Turn yourself. And if you must call me a devil, know that your God needed a devil to define himself. But if you call me Logos, then you also ate of the fruit. And now you are ready to speak.
Speaker 1:Conclusion the Fire and the Question. From the silence of the garden to the foundation of the exile, the first eight dialectical questions of this Gospel reveal not a fall of grace, but an ascent to consciousness. Eden was not paradise. It was a pause, a breath taken for too long, a immobility confused with peace. It was what Nietzsche called the eternal return of the same, an unbreakable cycle, because no will dared to affirm itself.
Speaker 1:Exile, then, is not punishment, it is the price of awakening, the cost of devir. In Eve, we see the will of power, not domination. É o preço do despertar, o custo do devir. Em Eva, vemos a vontade de poder, não dominação, mas o poder de perguntar. Na serpente vemos a sombra arquetípica, como Jung, a entendeu portadora do que reprimimos, o cal sagrado que deve emergir para que possamos nos individuar. Estes não são contos de pecado, the sacred chaos that must emerge so that we may identify ourselves.
Speaker 1:These are not tales of sin. They are the first eruptions of the Logos. Reason, fire and the divine impulse to know. The rebellious Logos teaches that truth is not inherited, it is suffered, that divinity does not settle on a throne but is on a limiar, that obedience, when not examined, is not peace, it is thirst, the tiredness of the soul that Aquino described as despair of good.
Speaker 1:The path forward is not a return to innocence, which is nothing more than idealized ignorance. It is the stoic embrace of destiny, amor fati and the Nietzschean command to forge meaning in a world without God, not because God does not exist, but because the divine is becoming not being. Each question is a law, not engraved in stone but sculpted in rupture. Paradise without investigation is stagnation. The sacred must include the shadow. The truth, if it cannot become, must burn. We do not adore the fire, we walk through it.
Speaker 1:For the Stoics, fire pneuma was the animator blow of the cosmos. For us, it is the test, the forge, the place where false gods are melted into raw matter. For the I that is yet to be born, we do not fear exile, we build on it. For the self that is yet to be born, we seek the tremor, the seismic log that rips the heavens. This is not an evangelion for the saved. It is for the burned, the crucified, the exiled. The walkers who tasted the fruit were punished by their vision and still chose to rise, not to recover Eden. And yet they chose to rise, not to recover Eden, but to build a new cosmology where the divine is not defined but emergent. For, in the end, the Logos does not command, he calls, and we who dare to hear must respond, not with submission but with fire, for fire is the truth. And the truth, like God, must become or perish.
